3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 vs MAF15

Princess Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 vs Xiaomi MAF15

What Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 does better (4) and where MAF15 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Princess Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$80
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi MAF15
Xiaomi · 2024MAF15
8.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$75
8.1Power & capacity6.8
8.4Versatility5.6
9.6Controls & convenience9.6

Why is Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001 better than MAF15?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 5.5 l+45%
  2. BakingYes · MAF15: No
  3. Grill functionYes · MAF15: No
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is MAF15 better than Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001?

  1. Viewing windowNo · Aerofryer 01.182254.01.001: Yes
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 220 °C+10%
  3. Min. temperature50 °C vs 40 °C+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi MAF15Xiaomi MAF15≈ US$758.7
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l5.5 l
Max. temperature200 °C220 °C
Min. temperature50 °C40 °C
Food capacity2 kg—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, GrillCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYesYes
App control—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width400 mm—
Height322 mm—
Depth305 mm—
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare