3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 01.182257.01.001 vs AF200

Princess 01.182257.01.001 vs TurboTronic AF200

What 01.182257.01.001 does better (7) and where AF200 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Princess 01.182257.01.001
Princess · 202501.182257.01.001
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic AF200
TurboTronic · 2025AF200
6.1Score
0 advantages
7.8Power & capacity6.7
7.6Versatility4.1
9.2Controls & convenience3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

01.182257.01.001AF200
267 × 294465383 × 320316
01.182257.01.001AF200Difference
Height294 mm320 mm−26 mm
Width267 mm383 mm−116 mm
Depth465 mm316 mm+149 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 01.182257.01.001 better than AF200?

  1. Power2,000 W vs 1,750 W+14%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 7.2 l+11%
  3. BakingYes · AF200: No
  4. Grill functionYes · AF200: No
  5. Viewing windowYes · AF200: No
  6. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  7. Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No

Why is AF200 better than 01.182257.01.001?

AF200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power2,000 W1,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l7.2 l
Automatic programmes88
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Cord storage—Yes
Width267 mm383 mm
Height294 mm320 mm
Depth465 mm316 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare