3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Knetrax vs MX-4870

Pocoline Knetrax vs Tristar MX-4870

What Knetrax does better (1) and where MX-4870 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Pocoline Knetrax
Pocoline · 2026Knetrax
6.1Score
1 advantage≈ US$55
Higher score
vs
Tristar MX-4870
Tristar · 2026MX-4870
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$65
6.6Power & capacity4.5
3.7Controls & convenience2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

KnetraxMX-4870
226 × 315361209 × 320351
KnetraxMX-4870Difference
Height315 mm320 mm−5 mm
Width226 mm209 mm+17 mm
Depth361 mm351 mm+10 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Knetrax better than MX-4870?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 800 W+88%

Why is MX-4870 better than Knetrax?

  1. Heating / cooking functionNo · Knetrax: Yes
  2. Speed settings10 vs 12+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Pocoline KnetraxPocoline Knetrax≈ US$556.1
Tristar MX-4870Tristar MX-4870≈ US$654.8
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.5 l4.5 l
Speed settings1012
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing action—No
Mixer design—Tilt-head
Attachment hub (power outlet)—No
Pulse function—Yes
Soft start—No
Heating / cooking functionNoYes
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments included—Whisk, Dough hook, Splash guard
Number of accessories—5
Cooking modes
FunctionsKneadKnead, Mix, Blend, Cook
Controls & smart
Timer—No
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
HousingStainless steelStainless steel
Cord length—1 m
Weight—2.2 kg
Width226 mm209 mm
Height315 mm320 mm
Depth361 mm351 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare