2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA555 vs Dual Basket Window T17216

Philips NA555 vs Tower Dual Basket Window T17216

What NA555 does better (3) and where Dual Basket Window T17216 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA555
Philips · 2026NA555
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$200
vs
Tower Dual Basket Window T17216
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
9.6Power & capacity9.3
9.3Versatility8.7
5.3Controls & convenience9.6

Why is NA555 better than Dual Basket Window T17216?

  1. Power2,750 W vs 2,400 W+15%
  2. Min. temperature40 °C vs 80 °C2×
  3. SteamingYes · Dual Basket Window T17216: No

Why is Dual Basket Window T17216 better than NA555?

  1. Grill functionNo · NA555: Yes
  2. Keep warmNo · NA555: Yes
  3. Viewing windowNo · NA555: Yes
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · NA555: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA555Philips NA555≈ US$2009.4
Power & capacity
Power2,750 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l9 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature40 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteam, Air fry, Roast—
SteamingYesNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones22
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlastic—
Cord storageYes—
Width—421 mm
Height—298 mm
Depth—400 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare