2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA555 vs FRH 1700

Philips NA555 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1700

What NA555 does better (5) and where FRH 1700 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA555
Philips · 2026NA555
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
vs
Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ US$85
9.6Power & capacity7.3
9.3Versatility8.9
5.3Controls & convenience8.4

Why is NA555 better than FRH 1700?

  1. Power2,750 W vs 1,700 W+62%
  2. Baskets / cooking zones2 vs 12×
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 8 l+12%
  4. SteamingYes · FRH 1700: No
  5. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED

Why is FRH 1700 better than NA555?

  1. BakingNo · NA555: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · NA555: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · NA555: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · NA555: Yes
  5. Non-stick coatingNo · NA555: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA555Philips NA555≈ US$2009.4
Power & capacity
Power2,750 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l8 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature40 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteam, Air fry, RoastAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingYesNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones21
Viewing windowNoYes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
Timer—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Cord storageYes—
Width—260 mm
Height—300 mm
Depth—470 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare