3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA552 vs Dual Basket Window T17216

Philips NA552 vs Tower Dual Basket Window T17216

What NA552 does better (4) and where Dual Basket Window T17216 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA552
Philips · 2025NA552
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$190
vs
Tower Dual Basket Window T17216
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
9.6Power & capacity9.3
8.5Versatility8.7
7.5Controls & convenience9.7

Why is NA552 better than Dual Basket Window T17216?

  1. Power2,750 W vs 2,400 W+15%
  2. Min. temperature40 °C vs 80 °C2×
  3. BakingYes · Dual Basket Window T17216: No
  4. DehydratingYes · Dual Basket Window T17216: No

Why is Dual Basket Window T17216 better than NA552?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  2. Grill functionNo · NA552: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · NA552: Yes
  4. Viewing windowNo · NA552: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA552Philips NA552≈ US$1909.4
Power & capacity
Power2,750 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l9 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature40 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones12
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlastic—
Cord storageYes—
Width—421 mm
Height382 mm298 mm
Depth—400 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare