2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA551 vs Dual Basket Window T17216

Philips NA551 vs Tower Dual Basket Window T17216

What NA551 does better (1) and where Dual Basket Window T17216 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA551
Philips · 2025NA551
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$200
vs
Tower Dual Basket Window T17216
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
9.1Power & capacity9.3
9.4Versatility8.7
7.2Controls & convenience9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA551Dual Basket Window T17216
383 × 355421 × 298400
NA551Dual Basket Window T17216Difference
Height355 mm298 mm+57 mm
Width383 mm421 mm−38 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA551 better than Dual Basket Window T17216?

  1. Power2,750 W vs 2,400 W+15%

Why is Dual Basket Window T17216 better than NA551?

  1. Sync / match finishNo · NA551: Yes
  2. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
  3. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA551Philips NA551≈ US$2009.4
Power & capacity
Power2,750 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l9 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry—
Steaming—No
Baking—No
Grill function—Yes
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—Yes
Baskets / cooking zones22
Sync / match finishNoYes
Viewing window—Yes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlastic—
Width383 mm421 mm
Height355 mm298 mm
Depth—400 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare