2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA352 vs R301002 VENTO

Philips NA352 vs Remoska R301002 VENTO

What NA352 does better (4) and where R301002 VENTO wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA352
Philips · 2025NA352
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
Remoska R301002 VENTO
Remoska · 2025R301002 VENTO
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$130
8.6Power & capacity5.1
6.1Versatility4.1
8.4Controls & convenience4.9

Why is NA352 better than R301002 VENTO?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · R301002 VENTO: No
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 6.3 l+43%
  3. BakingYes · R301002 VENTO: No
  4. DisplayLED vs None (dials / switches)

Why is R301002 VENTO better than NA352?

  1. Viewing windowNo · NA352: Yes
  2. Max. temperature180 °C vs 190 °C+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA352Philips NA352≈ US$1308.6
Power & capacity
Power2,750 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l6.3 l
Max. temperature180 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, ReheatCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Height444 mm—
Depth314 mm—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare