- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- NA342 vs FRH 1850
Philips NA342 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1850
What NA342 does better (3) and where FRH 1850 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is NA342 better than FRH 1850?
- Power2,000 W vs 1,870 W+7%
- BakingYes · FRH 1850: No
- DisplayLCD vs LED
Why is FRH 1850 better than NA342?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7.2 l vs 7.5 l+4%
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 230 °C+21%
- DehydratingNo · NA342: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,000 W | 1,870 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 7.2 l | 7.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 10 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 230 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat | Air fry, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | Yes |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | Yes |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LED |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Width | 333 mm | — |
| Depth | 453 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
