2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA330 vs FRH 1700

Philips NA330 vs Rommelsbacher FRH 1700

What NA330 does better (2) and where FRH 1700 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$85
vs
Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.2Power & capacity7.3
8.9Versatility8.9
6.7Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA330FRH 1700
324 × 303436260 × 300470
NA330FRH 1700Difference
Height303 mm300 mm+3 mm
Width324 mm260 mm+64 mm
Depth436 mm470 mm−34 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA330 better than FRH 1700?

  1. DehydratingYes · FRH 1700: No
  2. DisplayLCD vs LED

Why is FRH 1700 better than NA330?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 8 l+29%
  2. Keep warmNo · NA330: Yes
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · NA330: Yes
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l8 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLED
Timer—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingMetalStainless steel
Width324 mm260 mm
Height303 mm300 mm
Depth436 mm470 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare