2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA330 vs NA331

Philips NA330 vs Philips NA331

What NA330 does better (3) and where NA331 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA330
Philips · 2024NA330
7.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
vs
Philips NA331
Philips · 2025NA331
6.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$120
5.2Power & capacity5.3
8.9Versatility7.7
6.7Controls & convenience4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA330NA331
324 × 303436386 × 366388
NA330NA331Difference
Height303 mm366 mm−63 mm
Width324 mm386 mm−62 mm
Depth436 mm388 mm+48 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA330 better than NA331?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 1,500 W+13%
  2. DehydratingYes · NA331: No
  3. Viewing windowYes · NA331: No

Why is NA331 better than NA330?

  1. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA330Philips NA330≈ US$857.4
Philips NA331Philips NA331≈ US$1206.3
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l6.2 l
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
Timer—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingMetalPlastic
Width324 mm386 mm
Height303 mm366 mm
Depth436 mm388 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare