2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA321 vs Multi Taste 1550

Philips NA321 vs WMF Multi Taste 1550

What NA321 does better (1) and where Multi Taste 1550 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA321
Philips · 2024NA321
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$120
vs
WMF Multi Taste 1550
WMF · 2024Multi Taste 1550
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
2.8Power & capacity3.0
4.1Versatility9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA321Multi Taste 1550
286 × 294375 × 270
NA321Multi Taste 1550Difference
Height294 mm270 mm+24 mm
Width286 mm375 mm−89 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA321 better than Multi Taste 1550?

  1. Max. temperature190 °C vs 180 °C+6%

Why is Multi Taste 1550 better than NA321?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,550 W+11%
  2. BakingNo · NA321: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · NA321: Yes
  4. DehydratingNo · NA321: Yes
  5. Keep warmNo · NA321: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA321Philips NA321≈ US$1203.7
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,550 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l4.2 l
Max. temperature190 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—Yes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width286 mm375 mm
Height294 mm270 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare