2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA321 vs Phoenix

Philips NA321 vs Ufesa Phoenix

What NA321 does better (0) and where Phoenix wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA321
Philips · 2024NA321
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Ufesa Phoenix
Ufesa · 2024Phoenix
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
2.8Power & capacity7.7
4.1Versatility4.1

Why is NA321 better than Phoenix?

NA321 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Phoenix better than NA321?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 6 l+43%
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,800 W+29%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  4. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA321Philips NA321≈ US$1203.7
Ufesa PhoenixUfesa Phoenix≈ US$1207.5
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l6 l
Automatic programmes—10
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
HousingPlasticMetal
Width286 mm—
Height294 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare