2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA230 vs TMPFR200

Philips NA230 vs T&M TMPFR200

What NA230 does better (4) and where TMPFR200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA230
Philips · 2024NA230
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$90
Higher score
vs
T&M TMPFR200
T&M · 2024TMPFR200
7.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$90
4.6Power & capacity6.8
8.9Versatility5.2
9.0Controls & convenience7.8

Why is NA230 better than TMPFR200?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · TMPFR200: No
  2. BakingYes · TMPFR200: No
  3. Grill functionYes · TMPFR200: No
  4. Keep warmYes · TMPFR200: No

Why is TMPFR200 better than NA230?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 8 l+29%
  2. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
  3. Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA230Philips NA230≈ US$908.0
T&M TMPFR200T&M TMPFR200≈ US$907.3
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l8 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature180 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—60 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Cord storageYes—
Width404 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare