2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA229 vs AF250

Philips NA229 vs TurboTronic AF250

What NA229 does better (3) and where AF250 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA229
Philips · 2024NA229
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$60
vs
TurboTronic AF250
TurboTronic · 2025AF250
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
4.0Power & capacity5.9
9.3Versatility8.9
9.6Controls & convenience9.5

Why is NA229 better than AF250?

  1. Keep warmYes · AF250: No
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is AF250 better than NA229?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 6 l+43%
  2. DehydratingNo · NA229: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA229Philips NA229≈ US$608.3
TurboTronic AF250TurboTronic AF250≈ US$559.0
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l6 l
Automatic programmes—12
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature40 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width273 mm—
Height292 mm—
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare