2,674 models · 447 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA229 vs Vizion Eco Saver T17116

Philips NA229 vs Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116

What NA229 does better (3) and where Vizion Eco Saver T17116 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA229
Philips · 2024NA229
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$60
Higher score
vs
Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116
6.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$65
4.0Power & capacity2.6
9.3Versatility5.4
9.6Controls & convenience9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA229Vizion Eco Saver T17116
273 × 292335 × 315315
NA229Vizion Eco Saver T17116Difference
Height292 mm315 mm−23 mm
Width273 mm335 mm−62 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA229 better than Vizion Eco Saver T17116?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 1,350 W+11%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 4 l+5%
  3. Grill functionYes · Vizion Eco Saver T17116: No

Why is Vizion Eco Saver T17116 better than NA229?

  1. Viewing windowNo · NA229: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA229Philips NA229≈ US$608.3
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,350 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l4 l
Automatic programmes—6
Max. temperature200 °C—
Min. temperature40 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYes—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlastic—
Width273 mm335 mm
Height292 mm315 mm
Depth—315 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare