2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA229 vs N27290-56S

Philips NA229 vs Russell Hobbs N27290-56S

What NA229 does better (4) and where N27290-56S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA229
Philips · 2024NA229
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$60
vs
Russell Hobbs N27290-56S
Russell Hobbs · 2024N27290-56S
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
4.0Power & capacity8.4
9.3Versatility8.6
9.6Controls & convenience5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA229N27290-56S
273 × 292322 × 385412
NA229N27290-56SDifference
Height292 mm385 mm−93 mm
Width273 mm322 mm−49 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA229 better than N27290-56S?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · N27290-56S: No
  2. Grill functionYes · N27290-56S: No
  3. Keep warmYes · N27290-56S: No
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is N27290-56S better than NA229?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 8.5 l2×
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,800 W+20%
  3. DehydratingNo · NA229: Yes
  4. Min. temperature40 °C vs 30 °C+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA229Philips NA229≈ US$608.3
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l8.5 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature40 °C30 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width273 mm322 mm
Height292 mm385 mm
Depth—412 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare