3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NA120 vs EY1458 Easy Fry Compact

Philips NA120 vs Tefal EY1458 Easy Fry Compact

What NA120 does better (3) and where EY1458 Easy Fry Compact wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips NA120
Philips · 2024NA120
5.4Score
3 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
vs
Tefal EY1458 Easy Fry Compact
4.5Score
0 advantages≈ US$60
4.0Power & capacity2.8
7.6Versatility7.6
4.3Controls & convenience3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

NA120EY1458 Easy Fry Compact
368 × 293230 × 290320
NA120EY1458 Easy Fry CompactDifference
Height293 mm290 mm+3 mm
Width368 mm230 mm+138 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NA120 better than EY1458 Easy Fry Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l vs 3 l+40%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,300 W+15%
  3. DisplayLCD vs LED

Why is EY1458 Easy Fry Compact better than NA120?

EY1458 Easy Fry Compact has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA120Philips NA120≈ US$655.4
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.2 l3 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width368 mm230 mm
Height293 mm290 mm
Depth—320 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Tefal Easy Fry
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare