3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PHAO 1015 vs SB-3160

Philco PHAO 1015 vs Steinborg SB-3160

What PHAO 1015 does better (2) and where SB-3160 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Philco PHAO 1015
Philco · 2025PHAO 1015
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$410
vs
Steinborg SB-3160
Steinborg · 2026SB-3160
9.5Score
6 advantages
Higher score
9.7Power & capacity9.5
4.1Versatility9.7

Why is PHAO 1015 better than SB-3160?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 12 l+25%
  2. Max. temperature220 °C vs 190 °C+16%

Why is SB-3160 better than PHAO 1015?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  2. Power2,250 W vs 2,800 W+24%
  3. BakingNo · PHAO 1015: Yes
  4. Grill functionNo · PHAO 1015: Yes
  5. DehydratingNo · PHAO 1015: Yes
  6. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAO 1015Philco PHAO 1015≈ US$4109.4
Power & capacity
Power2,250 W2,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l12 l
Max. temperature220 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, ReheatAir fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones12
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Depth—350 mm
ColoursSilverGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare