- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAO 1015 vs HD9870
Philco PHAO 1015 vs Philips HD9870
What PHAO 1015 does better (1) and where HD9870 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAO 1015 better than HD9870?
- Max. temperature220 °C vs 180 °C+22%
Why is HD9870 better than PHAO 1015?
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,250 W | 2,225 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 15 l | — |
| Max. temperature | 220 °C | 180 °C |
| Food capacity | — | 1.4 kg |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Reheat | Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Width | — | 359 mm |
| Height | — | 398 mm |
| Depth | — | 359 mm |
| Colours | Silver | White |
