3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PHAO 1015 vs HD9867

Philco PHAO 1015 vs Philips HD9867

What PHAO 1015 does better (2) and where HD9867 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philco PHAO 1015
Philco · 2025PHAO 1015
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$410
Higher score
vs
Philips HD9867
Philips · 2020HD9867
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$400
9.7Power & capacity6.8
4.1Versatility4.1

Why is PHAO 1015 better than HD9867?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l vs 7.3 l2.1×
  2. Max. temperature220 °C vs 180 °C+22%

Why is HD9867 better than PHAO 1015?

  1. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAO 1015Philco PHAO 1015≈ US$4109.4
Philips HD9867Philips HD9867≈ US$4007.3
Power & capacity
Power2,250 W2,225 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)15 l7.3 l
Max. temperature220 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, ReheatAir fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
Non-stick coating—No
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Cord storage—Yes
Width—321 mm
Height—315 mm
Depth—433 mm
ColoursSilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare