- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAF vs TAFT-1000-GS
Philco PHAF vs Tornado TAFT-1000-GS
What PHAF does better (4) and where TAFT-1000-GS wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Power & capacity3.3
4.3Controls & convenience4.8
Why is PHAF better than TAFT-1000-GS?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 4.5 l+22%
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
- TimerYes · TAFT-1000-GS: No
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is TAFT-1000-GS better than PHAF?
- Viewing windowNo · PHAF: Yes
- Non-stick coatingNo · PHAF: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,100 W | — |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.5 l | 4.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 6 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Roast, Pizza |
| Steaming | — | No |
| Baking | — | No |
| Grill function | — | No |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | Yes |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | White | Black |
