- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAF vs NA331
Philco PHAF vs Philips NA331
What PHAF does better (1) and where NA331 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAF better than NA331?
- Power2,100 W vs 1,500 W+40%
Why is NA331 better than PHAF?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 6.2 l+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,100 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5.5 l | 6.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | 6 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill |
| Steaming | — | No |
| Baking | — | Yes |
| Grill function | — | Yes |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | — | 386 mm |
| Height | — | 366 mm |
| Depth | — | 388 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
