- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- PHAF 2108 vs AF510D
Philco PHAF 2108 vs TurboTronic AF510D
What PHAF 2108 does better (1) and where AF510D wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is PHAF 2108 better than AF510D?
- Max. temperature230 °C vs 200 °C+15%
Why is AF510D better than PHAF 2108?
- Power1,500 W vs 2,460 W+64%
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · PHAF 2108: Yes
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 5.5 l+38%
- Automatic programmes7 vs 9+29%
- DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 2,460 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 4 l | 5.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 7 | 9 |
| Max. temperature | 230 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook | Cook, Air fry, Reheat, Pizza |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | — | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | Yes |
| Interior light | Yes | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Glass | Stainless steel |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Depth | — | 421 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Silver |
