2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. PHAF 2108 vs EK6642VDE

Philco PHAF 2108 vs Salter EK6642VDE

What PHAF 2108 does better (0) and where EK6642VDE wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philco PHAF 2108
Philco · 2026PHAF 2108
5.2Score
0 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Salter EK6642VDE
Salter · 2026EK6642VDE
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
4.2Power & capacity7.6
2.9Versatility8.3

Why is PHAF 2108 better than EK6642VDE?

PHAF 2108 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is EK6642VDE better than PHAF 2108?

  1. Power1,500 W vs 2,400 W+60%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 4.5 l+12%
  3. DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAF 2108Philco PHAF 2108≈ US$1105.2
Salter EK6642VDESalter EK6642VDE≈ US$1108.8
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l4.5 l
Automatic programmes7—
Max. temperature230 °C230 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCookCook, Air fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones—2
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowYes—
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNo—
HousingGlassPlastic
Height—370 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare