2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. NF-CC500 vs R301001 VENTO

Panasonic NF-CC500 vs Remoska R301001 VENTO

What NF-CC500 does better (2) and where R301001 VENTO wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Panasonic NF-CC500
Panasonic · 2025NF-CC500
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
vs
Remoska R301001 VENTO
Remoska · 2025R301001 VENTO
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$90
4.2Power & capacity3.4
4.1Versatility4.1
7.0Controls & convenience6.7

Why is NF-CC500 better than R301001 VENTO?

  1. Power1,450 W vs 1,350 W+7%
  2. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is R301001 VENTO better than NF-CC500?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 5.5 l+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Panasonic NF-CC500Panasonic NF-CC500≈ US$955.2
Power & capacity
Power1,450 W1,350 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l5.5 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fryCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesYes
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingGlassPlastic
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare