2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF1665 | vs AF250

Onbest AF1665 | vs TurboTronic AF250

What AF1665 | does better (4) and where AF250 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Onbest AF1665 |
Onbest · 2025AF1665 |
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$55
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic AF250
TurboTronic · 2025AF250
9.0Score
1 advantage≈ US$55
7.7Power & capacity5.9
9.5Versatility8.9
8.6Controls & convenience9.5

Why is AF1665 | better than AF250?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 1,500 W+20%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 6 l+8%
  3. Keep warmYes · AF250: No
  4. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)

Why is AF250 better than AF1665 |?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF1665 |: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Onbest AF1665 |Onbest AF1665 |≈ US$559.3
TurboTronic AF250TurboTronic AF250≈ US$559.0
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l6 l
Automatic programmes1212
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesYes
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingMetalPlastic
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare