- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Raf R.50 vs NA342
OBA Raf R.50 vs Philips NA342
What Raf R.50 does better (2) and where NA342 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Raf R.50 better than NA342?
- Power2,800 W vs 2,000 W+40%
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is NA342 better than Raf R.50?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 7.2 l+3%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,800 W | 2,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 7 l | 7.2 l |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | — | 333 mm |
| Depth | — | 453 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
