2,674 models · 447 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF170 vs AF200

Ninja AF170 vs Ninja AF200

What AF170 does better (3) and where AF200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Ninja AF170
Ninja · 2026AF170
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
vs
Ninja AF200
Ninja · 2025AF200
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
6.5Power & capacity7.9
5.8Versatility8.3
6.9Controls & convenience3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF170AF200
280 × 305360380 × 315470
AF170AF200Difference
Height305 mm315 mm−10 mm
Width280 mm380 mm−100 mm
Depth360 mm470 mm−110 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF170 better than AF200?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · AF200: No
  2. DehydratingYes · AF200: No
  3. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)

Why is AF200 better than AF170?

  1. Baskets / cooking zones1 vs 22×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l vs 7.6 l+23%
  3. Power2,000 W vs 2,400 W+20%
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · AF170: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Ninja AF170Ninja AF170≈ US$957.2
Ninja AF200Ninja AF200≈ US$1407.6
Power & capacity
Power2,000 W2,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.2 l7.6 l
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Roast, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones12
Sync / match finish—Yes
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width280 mm380 mm
Height305 mm315 mm
Depth360 mm470 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare