3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Easy Fry Max vs NA332

Moulinex Easy Fry Max vs Philips NA332

What Easy Fry Max does better (1) and where NA332 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Moulinex Easy Fry Max
Moulinex · 2026Easy Fry Max
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$170
vs
Philips NA332
Philips · 2026NA332
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
5.3Power & capacity5.2
4.1Versatility6.1
5.7Controls & convenience3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Easy Fry MaxNA332
273 × 325375324 × 303436
Easy Fry MaxNA332Difference
Height325 mm303 mm+22 mm
Width273 mm324 mm−51 mm
Depth375 mm436 mm−61 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Easy Fry Max better than NA332?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is NA332 better than Easy Fry Max?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 6.2 l+24%
  2. Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
  3. Grill functionNo · Easy Fry Max: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA332Philips NA332≈ US$1905.6
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l6.2 l
Automatic programmes10—
Max. temperature—190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCookAir fry, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticMetal
Width273 mm324 mm
Height325 mm303 mm
Depth375 mm436 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
SeriesMoulinex Easy FryPhilips Airfryer
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare