3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 15 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 vs Raf R.50

Moulinex Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 vs OBA Raf R.50

What Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 does better (2) and where Raf R.50 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Moulinex Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$190
vs
OBA Raf R.50
OBA · 2026Raf R.50
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
7.6Versatility7.6

Why is Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0 better than Raf R.50?

  1. Keep warmYes · Raf R.50: No
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is Raf R.50 better than Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0?

  1. BakingNo · Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0: Yes
  2. TimerNo · Easy Fry Infrared charcoal EZ832HF0: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

OBA Raf R.50OBA Raf R.50≈ US$1509.4
Power & capacity
Power—2,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l7 l
Max. temperature—200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingNo—
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width310 mm—
Height315 mm—
Depth396 mm—
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare