- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual vs AirCook TrioZone Q636
Moulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual vs TESLA AirCook TrioZone Q636
What Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual does better (3) and where AirCook TrioZone Q636 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Power & capacity7.3
8.7Versatility8.6
Why is Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual better than AirCook TrioZone Q636?
- Automatic programmes8 vs 32.7×
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%
Why is AirCook TrioZone Q636 better than Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10 l vs 12 l+20%
- Power2,700 W vs 2,800 W+4%
- BakingNo · Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,700 W | 2,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 10 l | 12 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 3 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 190 °C |
| Food capacity | 5 kg | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Roast, Grill, Reheat | Cook, Sauté, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Pizza |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 2 | — |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Ceramic |
| Width | 245 mm | — |
| Height | 398 mm | — |
| Depth | 450 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ninja DZ950vsMoulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual
9.59.5
vs
Ninja SL500vsMoulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack Dual
9.69.5
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack DualvsNinja DD103EUSD1
9.59.7
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack DualvsWartmann WM-2511 AF
9.59.5
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Crispy Stack DualvsSteinborg SB-3160
9.59.5
vs
Ninja CRISPi PRO AS090vsTESLA AirCook TrioZone Q636
8.18.4