3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Easy Fry Compact vs 27681-56

Moulinex Easy Fry Compact vs Russell Hobbs 27681-56

What Easy Fry Compact does better (1) and where 27681-56 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Moulinex Easy Fry Compact
Moulinex · 2024Easy Fry Compact
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$160
vs
Russell Hobbs 27681-56
Russell Hobbs · 202527681-56
7.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$160
Higher score
2.4Power & capacity6.8
4.1Versatility6.1

Why is Easy Fry Compact better than 27681-56?

  1. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is 27681-56 better than Easy Fry Compact?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 4.5 l+50%
  2. Keep warmNo · Easy Fry Compact: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power—2,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l4.5 l
Automatic programmes—9
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fryCook, Air fry, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingNo—
HousingMetalPlastic
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare