3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Crisp&Go FY7014E0 vs NA332

Moulinex Crisp&Go FY7014E0 vs Philips NA332

What Crisp&Go FY7014E0 does better (1) and where NA332 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Moulinex Crisp&Go FY7014E0
Moulinex · 2026Crisp&Go FY7014E0
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$180
vs
Philips NA332
Philips · 2026NA332
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$190
Higher score
3.8Power & capacity5.2
4.1Versatility6.1
8.5Controls & convenience3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Crisp&Go FY7014E0NA332
228 × 270280324 × 303436
Crisp&Go FY7014E0NA332Difference
Height270 mm303 mm−33 mm
Width228 mm324 mm−96 mm
Depth280 mm436 mm−156 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Crisp&Go FY7014E0 better than NA332?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · NA332: No

Why is NA332 better than Crisp&Go FY7014E0?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.8 l vs 6.2 l+63%
  2. Grill functionNo · Crisp&Go FY7014E0: Yes
  3. DisplayLED vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA332Philips NA332≈ US$1905.6
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.8 l6.2 l
Max. temperature—190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Roast, ReheatAir fry, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLCD
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
Housing—Metal
Weight5.3 kg—
Width228 mm324 mm
Height270 mm303 mm
Depth280 mm436 mm
ColoursGreenBlack
Series—Philips Airfryer
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare