3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 48992 Folding vs Desire 20356-56

Morphy Richards 48992 Folding vs Russell Hobbs Desire 20356-56

What 48992 Folding does better (0) and where Desire 20356-56 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Morphy Richards 48992 Folding
Morphy Richards · 201348992 Folding
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ US$95
vs
Russell Hobbs Desire 20356-56
Russell Hobbs · 2014Desire 20356-56
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$100
Higher score
2.4Power & capacity5.2
2.4Versatility9.4
3.7Controls & convenience8.1

Why is 48992 Folding better than Desire 20356-56?

48992 Folding has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Desire 20356-56 better than 48992 Folding?

  1. Power300 W vs 1,000 W3.3×
  2. Number of accessories2 vs 84×
  3. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · 48992 Folding: Yes
  4. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l vs 5 l+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power300 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l5 l
Speed settings6—
Max. dough per batch—2.5 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing action—Yes
Pulse function—Yes
Soft start—No
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Blender jug—1.5 l
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Recipe bookWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Patisserie set
Number of accessories28
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, WhiskKnead, Whisk, Mix, Crush ice, Blend
Controls & smart
Display—None (dials / switches)
Timer—No
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coating—Yes
Housing—Plastic
Cord storage—Yes
ColoursWhiteRed
Series—Russell Hobbs Desire Collection
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare