3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 48992 Folding vs KM-6618 im Retro-Design

Morphy Richards 48992 Folding vs Rosenstein & Söhne KM-6618 im Retro-Design

What 48992 Folding does better (1) and where KM-6618 im Retro-Design wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Morphy Richards 48992 Folding
Morphy Richards · 201348992 Folding
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$95
vs
Rosenstein & Söhne KM-6618 im Retro-Design
Rosenstein & Söhne · 2015KM-6618 im Retro-Design
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
2.4Power & capacity6.6
2.4Versatility7.9
3.7Controls & convenience9.6

Why is 48992 Folding better than KM-6618 im Retro-Design?

  1. Speed settings6 vs 5+20%

Why is KM-6618 im Retro-Design better than 48992 Folding?

  1. Power300 W vs 1,200 W4×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l vs 6.6 l+89%
  3. Number of accessories2 vs 52.5×
  4. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · 48992 Folding: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power300 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l6.6 l
Speed settings65
Mixing & processing
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Recipe bookWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Patisserie set
Number of accessories25
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, WhiskKnead, Whisk, Mix
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Weight—3.9 kg
Width—331 mm
Height—303 mm
Depth—278 mm
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare