3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. MF-CN35C2 vs HD9285

Midea MF-CN35C2 vs Philips HD9285

What MF-CN35C2 does better (0) and where HD9285 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Midea MF-CN35C2
Midea · 2022MF-CN35C2
5.3Score
0 advantages≈ US$180
vs
Philips HD9285
Philips · 2023HD9285
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$180
Higher score
3.6Power & capacity8.2
6.9Versatility9.3
6.3Controls & convenience9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

MF-CN35C2HD9285
350 × 260306300 × 330410
MF-CN35C2HD9285Difference
Height260 mm330 mm−70 mm
Width350 mm300 mm+50 mm
Depth306 mm410 mm−104 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MF-CN35C2 better than HD9285?

MF-CN35C2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is HD9285 better than MF-CN35C2?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l vs 7.2 l2.2×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · MF-CN35C2: Yes
  3. Power1,500 W vs 2,000 W+33%
  4. Min. temperature80 °C vs 40 °C2×
  5. Keep warmNo · MF-CN35C2: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Midea MF-CN35C2Midea MF-CN35C2≈ US$1805.3
Philips HD9285Philips HD9285≈ US$1809.4
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W2,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.2 l7.2 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C40 °C
Food capacity—1.4 kg
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLED
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width350 mm300 mm
Height260 mm330 mm
Depth306 mm410 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare