3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. MA-400 vs HD9200

Mestic MA-400 vs Philips HD9200

What MA-400 does better (0) and where HD9200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Mestic MA-400
Mestic · 2025MA-400
0 advantages≈ US$70
vs
Philips HD9200
Philips · 2025HD9200
7.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
2.3Power & capacity4.1

Why is MA-400 better than HD9200?

MA-400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is HD9200 better than MA-400?

  1. Power1,300 W vs 1,400 W+8%
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
  3. Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Mestic MA-400Mestic MA-400≈ US$70
Philips HD9200Philips HD9200≈ US$707.6
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l—
Max. temperature190 °C200 °C
Food capacity—0.8 kg
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
Steaming—No
Baking—Yes
Grill function—Yes
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
Non-stick coating—Yes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Cord storage—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Series—Philips Airfryer Essential
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare