- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 3in1 vs Boston EK6147MW
MalTec 3in1 vs Salter Boston EK6147MW
What 3in1 does better (2) and where Boston EK6147MW wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Power & capacity7.2
6.8Versatility4.4
5.1Controls & convenience5.1
Why is 3in1 better than Boston EK6147MW?
- Power2,000 W vs 1,300 W+54%
- Planetary mixing actionYes · Boston EK6147MW: No
Why is Boston EK6147MW better than 3in1?
- Pulse functionNo · 3in1: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,000 W | 1,300 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 2 l | — |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | Yes | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | No |
| Pulse function | No | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | — |
| Bowl material | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Dough hook, Splash guard, Mincer | — |
| Number of accessories | 3 | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix, Chop, Slice, Blend, Cook | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Colours | Black | White |
Related comparisons
vs
Smeg SMF05vsSalter Boston EK6147MW
6.06.2
vs
Smeg SMF04vsSalter Boston EK6147MW
6.26.2
vs
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600vsSalter Boston EK6147MW
6.66.2
vs
Salter Boston EK6147MWvsSilvercrest KM 900
6.26.5
vs
Klarstein Verosteel TB-803vsSalter Boston EK6147MW
6.56.2
vs
BerlingerHaus Leonardo CollectionvsSalter Boston EK6147MW
6.46.2