3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Crousty Light Duo diet fryer vs NA351

Little Balance Crousty Light Duo diet fryer vs Philips NA351

What Crousty Light Duo diet fryer does better (1) and where NA351 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Little Balance Crousty Light Duo diet fryer
Little Balance · 2025Crousty Light Duo diet fryer
1 advantage≈ US$120
vs
Philips NA351
Philips · 2024NA351
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$120
Higher score
8.6Power & capacity8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Crousty Light Duo diet fryerNA351
380 × 360315315 × 444314
Crousty Light Duo diet fryerNA351Difference
Height360 mm444 mm−84 mm
Width380 mm315 mm+65 mm
Depth315 mm314 mm+1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Crousty Light Duo diet fryer better than NA351?

  1. Max. temperature190 °C vs 180 °C+6%

Why is NA351 better than Crousty Light Duo diet fryer?

  1. Power2,460 W vs 2,750 W+12%
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA351Philips NA351≈ US$1208.6
Power & capacity
Power2,460 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l9 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature190 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat
Steaming—No
Baking—Yes
Grill function—No
Dehydrating—No
Keep warm—No
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LED
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—Yes
Non-stick coating—No
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width380 mm315 mm
Height360 mm444 mm
Depth315 mm314 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
Series—Philips Series 3000
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare