- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Mastic vs Iridea food processor
Lehmann Mastic vs Tognana Iridea food processor
What Mastic does better (1) and where Iridea food processor wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Power & capacity6.5
3.7Controls & convenience5.1
Why is Mastic better than Iridea food processor?
- Heating / cooking functionYes · Iridea food processor: No
Why is Iridea food processor better than Mastic?
- Power1,300 W vs 1,400 W+8%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 5.2 l+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,300 W | 1,400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 5.2 l |
| Speed settings | — | 6 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | — | No |
| Pulse function | — | Yes |
| Soft start | — | No |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | No |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Number of accessories | — | 1 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Mix, Blend, Cook | Knead |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Weight | — | 4.1 kg |
| Width | — | 245 mm |
| Height | — | 310 mm |
| Depth | — | 350 mm |
