- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Mastic vs 25727
Lehmann Mastic vs Ruhhy 25727
What Mastic does better (0) and where 25727 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Mastic better than 25727?
Mastic has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 25727 better than Mastic?
- Power1,300 W vs 2,000 W+54%
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 6.2 l+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,300 W | 2,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 6.2 l |
| Speed settings | — | 11 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | — | No |
| Pulse function | — | Yes |
| Soft start | — | No |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | — |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | — |
| Attachments included | — | Whisk, Dough hook |
| Number of accessories | — | 3 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Mix, Blend, Cook | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | — | Touchscreen |
| Timer | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | — |
| Housing | Stainless steel | — |
| Weight | — | 5.8 kg |
| Width | — | 230 mm |
| Height | — | 325 mm |
| Depth | — | 360 mm |
