3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mastic vs Bake Essential QA1618

Lehmann Mastic vs Moulinex Bake Essential QA1618

What Mastic does better (2) and where Bake Essential QA1618 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Lehmann Mastic
Lehmann · 2025Mastic
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
Moulinex Bake Essential QA1618
Moulinex · 2025Bake Essential QA1618
0 advantages≈ US$160
6.3Power & capacity3.1

Why is Mastic better than Bake Essential QA1618?

  1. Power1,300 W vs 800 W+62%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.8 l+4%

Why is Bake Essential QA1618 better than Mastic?

Bake Essential QA1618 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Lehmann MasticLehmann Mastic≈ US$1305.7
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.8 l
Speed settings—6
Max. dough per batch—1.8 kg
Mixing & processing
Heating / cooking functionYes—
Bowl materialStainless steel—
Attachments included—Whisk, Dough hook, Mincer
Number of accessories—3
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Mix, Blend, Cook—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
HousingStainless steel—
Weight—4.8 kg
Width—246 mm
Height—443 mm
Depth—413 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare