3,098 models · 470 brandsupdated 29 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L vs Vizion Eco Saver T17116

Klarstein FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L vs Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116

What FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L does better (2) and where Vizion Eco Saver T17116 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Klarstein FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L
Klarstein · 2022FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$65
vs
Tower Vizion Eco Saver T17116
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
3.8Power & capacity2.6
2.5Versatility5.4
7.9Controls & convenience9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

FRY4-CrispPro-3.5LVizion Eco Saver T17116
250 × 290300335 × 315315
FRY4-CrispPro-3.5LVizion Eco Saver T17116Difference
Height290 mm315 mm−25 mm
Width250 mm335 mm−85 mm
Depth300 mm315 mm−15 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L better than Vizion Eco Saver T17116?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,350 W+4%
  2. Automatic programmes8 vs 6+33%

Why is Vizion Eco Saver T17116 better than FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l vs 4 l+14%
  2. BakingNo · FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L: Yes
  3. Viewing windowNo · FRY4-CrispPro-3.5L: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,350 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.5 l4 l
Automatic programmes86
Max. temperature200 °C—
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry—
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlastic—
Width250 mm335 mm
Height290 mm315 mm
Depth300 mm315 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare