3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AeroVital Cube OV12-001 vs HF 900

Klarstein AeroVital Cube OV12-001 vs Steba HF 900

What AeroVital Cube OV12-001 does better (7) and where HF 900 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Klarstein AeroVital Cube OV12-001
Klarstein · 2018AeroVital Cube OV12-001
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ US$140
Higher score
vs
Steba HF 900
Steba · 2017HF 900
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$140
9.3Power & capacity3.3
8.5Versatility6.9
5.3Controls & convenience8.9

Why is AeroVital Cube OV12-001 better than HF 900?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)12 l vs 2 l6×
  2. Power1,600 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  3. DehydratingYes · HF 900: No
  4. Keep warmYes · HF 900: No
  5. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  6. Max. temperature220 °C vs 200 °C+10%
  7. Min. temperature50 °C vs 80 °C+60%

Why is HF 900 better than AeroVital Cube OV12-001?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AeroVital Cube OV12-001: Yes
  2. BakingNo · AeroVital Cube OV12-001: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · AeroVital Cube OV12-001: Yes
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · AeroVital Cube OV12-001: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Steba HF 900Steba HF 900≈ US$1406.0
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)12 l2 l
Automatic programmes16—
Max. temperature220 °C200 °C
Min. temperature50 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Dehydrate, Keep warmAir fry, Bake, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserieYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
Timer—Yes
Max. timer—30 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—330 mm
Height—250 mm
Depth—330 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare