2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Classic vs QA1601

KLAMER Classic vs Moulinex QA1601

What Classic does better (3) and where QA1601 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

KLAMER Classic
KLAMER · 2025Classic
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
vs
Moulinex QA1601
Moulinex · 2025QA1601
4.2Score
0 advantages≈ US$170
6.9Power & capacity4.0
6.5Versatility3.9
7.5Controls & convenience5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

ClassicQA1601
375 × 230330430 × 260370
ClassicQA1601Difference
Height230 mm260 mm−30 mm
Width375 mm430 mm−55 mm
Depth330 mm370 mm−40 mm
Weight5.1 kg4.4 kg+0.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Classic better than QA1601?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,000 W+40%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 4.8 l+15%
  3. TimerYes · QA1601: No

Why is QA1601 better than Classic?

QA1601 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

KLAMER ClassicKLAMER Classic≈ US$1508.2
Moulinex QA1601Moulinex QA1601≈ US$1704.2
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l4.8 l
Speed settings66
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionYesYes
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking function—No
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments included—Patisserie set
Number of accessories—1
Cooking modes
Functions—Knead
Controls & smart
DisplayLED—
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
HousingStainless steel—
Weight5.1 kg4.4 kg
Width375 mm430 mm
Height230 mm260 mm
Depth330 mm370 mm
Colours—Beige
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare