2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Classic vs KKM-TR 135525

KLAMER Classic vs Koenic KKM-TR 135525

What Classic does better (2) and where KKM-TR 135525 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

KLAMER Classic
KLAMER · 2025Classic
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
vs
Koenic KKM-TR 135525
Koenic · 2025KKM-TR 135525
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$200
Higher score
6.9Power & capacity7.6
6.5Versatility7.0
7.5Controls & convenience6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

ClassicKKM-TR 135525
375 × 230330370 × 375202
ClassicKKM-TR 135525Difference
Height230 mm375 mm−145 mm
Width375 mm370 mm+5 mm
Depth330 mm202 mm+128 mm
Weight5.1 kg7 kg−1.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Classic better than KKM-TR 135525?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,300 W+8%
  2. TimerYes · KKM-TR 135525: No

Why is KKM-TR 135525 better than Classic?

  1. DisplayLED vs LCD
Specifications

Side by side

KLAMER ClassicKLAMER Classic≈ US$1508.2
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l5.5 l
Speed settings6—
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionYesYes
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoNo
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scale—Yes
Heating / cooking function—No
Bowl materialStainless steel—
Attachments included—Whisk, Dough hook, Splash guard, Scale
Number of accessories—5
Cooking modes
Functions—Knead, Whisk, Mix
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLCD
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
HousingStainless steel—
Cord length—1.2 m
Weight5.1 kg7 kg
Width375 mm370 mm
Height230 mm375 mm
Depth330 mm202 mm
Colours—Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare