2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Prospero+ KHC29 vs QA1601

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29 vs Moulinex QA1601

What Prospero+ KHC29 does better (2) and where QA1601 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29
Kenwood · 2025Prospero+ KHC29
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$160
vs
Moulinex QA1601
Moulinex · 2025QA1601
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$170
Higher score
2.6Power & capacity4.0
7.1Versatility3.9
5.0Controls & convenience5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Prospero+ KHC29QA1601
250 × 240280430 × 260370
Prospero+ KHC29QA1601Difference
Height240 mm260 mm−20 mm
Width250 mm430 mm−180 mm
Depth280 mm370 mm−90 mm
Weight7.8 kg4.4 kg+3.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Prospero+ KHC29 better than QA1601?

  1. Number of accessories9 vs 19×
  2. Pulse functionYes · QA1601: No

Why is QA1601 better than Prospero+ KHC29?

  1. Planetary mixing actionNo · Prospero+ KHC29: Yes
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l vs 4.8 l+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Moulinex QA1601Moulinex QA1601≈ US$1704.2
Power & capacity
Power1,000 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4.3 l4.8 l
Speed settings—6
Max. dough per batch0.5 kg—
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoYes
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionYesNo
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scaleYes—
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Blender jug1.2 l—
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Food processor, Citrus press, Patisserie setPatisserie set
Number of accessories91
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, MixKnead
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
HousingPlastic—
Weight7.8 kg4.4 kg
Width250 mm430 mm
Height240 mm260 mm
Depth280 mm370 mm
ColoursSilverBeige
SeriesKenwood Prospero—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare