3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL vs FP827E10

Kenwood KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL vs Moulinex FP827E10

What KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL does better (3) and where FP827E10 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$330
Higher score
vs
Moulinex FP827E10
Moulinex · 2021FP827E10
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$290
8.2Power & capacity2.8
5.8Versatility3.5
3.7Controls & convenience9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XLFP827E10
225 × 370400280 × 400230
KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XLFP827E10Difference
Height370 mm400 mm−30 mm
Width225 mm280 mm−55 mm
Depth400 mm230 mm+170 mm
Weight11.5 kg6.5 kg+5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL better than FP827E10?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 3 l2.3×
  2. Power1,200 W vs 1,000 W+20%
  3. Number of accessories4 vs 3+33%

Why is FP827E10 better than KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · KVL65 Titanium Chef Baker XL: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Moulinex FP827E10Moulinex FP827E10≈ US$2906.2
Power & capacity
Power1,200 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l3 l
Mixing & processing
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Bowl materialStainless steelPlastic
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hookWhisk, Second bowl
Number of accessories43
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, MixKnead, Mix, Chop, Slice, Blend
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
HousingMetalPlastic
Weight11.5 kg6.5 kg
Width225 mm280 mm
Height370 mm400 mm
Depth400 mm230 mm
ColoursWhiteGrey
SeriesKenwood Chef Baker—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare