2,674 models · 447 brandsupdated 24 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. KVC65 vs QA5228

Kenwood KVC65 vs Moulinex QA5228

What KVC65 does better (4) and where QA5228 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KVC65
Kenwood · 2025KVC65
5.7Score
4 advantages≈ US$320
Higher score
vs
Moulinex QA5228
Moulinex · 2025QA5228
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$380
5.8Power & capacity5.0
3.9Versatility4.6
6.6Controls & convenience2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

KVC65QA5228
225 × 315395257 × 324424
KVC65QA5228Difference
Height315 mm324 mm−9 mm
Width225 mm257 mm−32 mm
Depth395 mm424 mm−29 mm
Weight9.5 kg6.8 kg+2.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KVC65 better than QA5228?

  1. Number of accessories4 vs 22×
  2. Power1,200 W vs 1,100 W+9%
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 4.6 l+9%
  4. TimerYes · QA5228: No

Why is QA5228 better than KVC65?

  1. Planetary mixing actionNo · KVC65: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Kenwood KVC65Kenwood KVC65≈ US$3205.7
Moulinex QA5228Moulinex QA5228≈ US$3804.6
Power & capacity
Power1,200 W1,100 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l4.6 l
Speed settings—8
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoYes
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scaleYes—
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hookWhisk, Dough hook
Number of accessories42
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Whisk, Mix, WeighKnead
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Housing—Stainless steel
Weight9.5 kg6.8 kg
Width225 mm257 mm
Height315 mm324 mm
Depth395 mm424 mm
Colours—Black
SeriesKenwood Chef Baker—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare